• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Bell Nunnally

News/Events

News | January 21, 2025

Executive Order 14173: Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit Based Opportunity

This executive order revokes previous affirmative action-based executive orders, including EO 11246, that required federal contractors and subcontractors to take affirmative action in their hiring practices with respect to minorities and women. EO 11246 was intended to slowly transform a contractor’s workforce to reflect the gender, racial and ethnic profile of the labor pools from which the contractor recruited and hired. However, this program was perceived by some to encourage preferential treatment in hiring not strictly based on qualifications and merit and was discarded. As of April 27, 2025, federal contractors and subcontractors were to cease complying with EO 11246 and instead embrace this executive order.

EO 14173 also directs the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) within the Department of Labor to immediately cease (a) promoting diversity and holding federal contractors and subcontractors responsible for taking affirmative action in employment and (b) allowing federal contractors and subcontractors to engage in workforce balancing based on race, color, sex, sexual preference, religion or national origin. Further, it requires all federal contract or grant award recipients to certify that they are in compliance with all anti-discrimination laws and that they do not operate any DEI programs that violate federal anti-discrimination laws. Their certification is deemed material to the federal government’s payment decision for the purposes of the False Claims Act, which imposes civil and criminal penalties on persons and companies who defraud governmental programs.

EO 14173 is also aimed at private employers beyond federal contractors and subcontractors. It recites that major corporations, financial institutions, the medical industry, large commercial airlines and others that have adopted race- and sex-based preferences under the guise of DEI may violate the federal civil rights laws. It orders the attorney general, in consultation with the heads of all federal agencies, to submit recommendations for enforcing the federal civil rights laws and a proposed enforcement plan identifying (1) key sectors of concern for each agency; (2) the most egregious and discriminatory DEI practitioners; (3) steps and measures to deter DEI programs (whether labeled DEI or otherwise) that constitute illegal discrimination or preferences, including identifying up to nine potential civil compliance investigations of publicly traded corporations, large nonprofit corporations and other large institutions; (4) strategies to encourage the private sector to end illegal DEI discrimination and preferences; and (5) litigation that would be potentially appropriate for federal lawsuits, intervention or statements of interest. Additionally, on Jan. 21, 2025, the acting head of the EEOC announced that one of her priorities would include rooting out unlawful DEI-motivated race and sex discrimination.

The executive order above does not define unlawful DEI practices. However, a memorandum issued on Feb. 5, 2025, by the acting director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management gives some indication. First, it states that unlawful discrimination related to DEI includes taking any employment action motivated in whole or part by protected characteristics. Second, it includes diversity requirements for the composition of hiring panels, as well as the composition of candidate pools. While outlining what is likely “illegal DEI” under the executive order, the memorandum specifically states that accessibility or disability accommodations do not fall within the purview of illegal DEI. These practices appear to be directed more toward affirmative action programs than corporate efforts to employ a diverse workforce, but EO 14173 has implications for private employers who are not government contractors.

A federal district court in Baltimore enjoined certain provisions of this order, but the injunction was stayed by a federal appellate court pending appeal. This and EO 14151 have been challenged in federal district courts in Illinois, Washington, D.C. and Pennsylvania.

Primary Sidebar

Stay in the know...
Don’t miss anything — Subscribe to our email list!
2323 Ross Avenue, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 | 214.740.1400
© 2026 Bell Nunnally All Rights Reserved
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Client Pay
legalink logo Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • People
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • News/Events
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Clients
  • Careers
  • Client Pay