• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP

News/Events

Alerts | October 31, 2023

National Labor Relations Board Update: Three Recent Decisions Focus on Protecting Worker Rights

The NLRB issued three decisions this summer that collectively show its predisposition to erring on the employee’s side when employee rights compete with workplace rules and directives.

Board Restores Protections for Employees Who Advocate for Others

In American Federation for Children, Inc. (decided August 25th), the Board overturned its longstanding precedent that limited protections for employees who advocate for non-employees, such as contract laborers. Specifically, the Board found that advocating for non-employees can be protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) if there might be ancillary benefits to the organization’s employees. For example, if contractor laborers are demanding higher wages or better working conditions, regular employees who support them may be protected from disciplinary action by the employer under the concept of “mutual aid and protection.” The Board also expanded the application of this concept to include situations where employees advocate for immigrants applying for work.

Board Returns to “Totality of Circumstances” Test for Determining Concerted Activity

In Miller Plastic Products, Inc. (decided August 25th), the Board issued a decision returning to the long-established test for determining whether an employee who intends to induce group action by fellow employees engages in “protected concerted activity,” thus obtaining protection for that activity under Section 7 of the NLRA. In this decision the Board reaffirmed the principle that the question of whether an employee has engaged in concreted activity is a factual based analysis based on the totality of circumstances. In prior decisions, the Board had utilized a narrower standard in determining whether the activity was specifically targeted at “wages, terms and conditions of employment” as referenced in the Act, which cloaks that activity under Section 7’s protections from employer discipline. In applying this broader standard, the Board stated, “The right of employees to engage in concerted activity to improve their working conditions is central to the National Labor Relations Act, and the Board should not artificially constrain the definition of ‘concerted activity.’” For example, if an employee is complaining about the organization’s outdated equipment, work hours or lack of adequate paid time off, that conduct is now perhaps protected under Section 7.

Board Adopts New Standard for Assessing Lawfulness of Work Rules

In Stericycle, Inc. (decided August 2nd), the Board adopted a new standard for evaluating employer work rules challenged as facially unlawful under Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA. In its decision the Board explained that, in its view, prior rulings on this issue permitted employers to adopt overbroad work rules that chill employees’ exercise of their right under Section 7 of the NLRA. Notably, the Board said that some work rules, such as attendance policies and confidentiality rules should no longer be held as per se lawful, regardless of the employer’s interests in drafting those policies. Instead, the general counsel has the ability and burden to show that the challenged work rule has a tendency to chill employees from exercising their Section 7 rights. If the general counsel accomplishes this, then the work rule is presumptively unlawful. The employer must then respond with evidence showing there is no more narrowly tailored rule that will accomplish its objectives. The Stericycle decision shifts the burden on the employer to show the propriety and necessity of its work rule as written, at the peril of it being ruled unlawful by the Board.

Conclusion

These three decisions collectively show a trend with the NLRB to interpret the Act in such a way that prioritizes protection of employee activity that in their view promotes the Act’s stated goals of improving wages, terms and conditions of employment, which can include the establishment of a union presence in the workplace.

Primary Sidebar

Related Attorneys

  • Jay M. Wallace

    Jay M. Wallace

    Partner

    jwallace@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1407

Related Practices

  • Labor and Employment
Stay in the know...
Don’t miss anything — Subscribe to our email list!
2323 Ross Avenue, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 | 214.740.1400
© 2025 Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP All Rights Reserved
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Client Pay
legalink logo Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • People
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • News/Events
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Clients
  • Careers
  • Client Pay