• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP

News/Events

Alerts | January 19, 2022

SCOTUS Halts Employer “Vaccinate-or-Test” Mandate for Private Employers While Green-Lighting Vaccination Mandate Directed to Certain Health Care Workers

In a much anticipated set of decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a mixed ruling on two key vaccination mandates issued by the Biden Administration: (1) Occupational Safety and Heath Administration’s (OSHA) “vax-or-test” mandate through OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS), which targets employers with 100 or more employees; and (2) the Omnibus COVID-19 Health Care Staff Vaccination Interim Final Rule issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which targets providers of Medicare and Medicaid.

The OSHA Ruling

By a split along traditional ideological lines, the Supreme Court halted OSHA’s ETS. The court agreed with the several states, businesses and non-profit organizations challenging OSHA’s mandate that OSHA exceeded its statutory authority with the ETS. The court granted the challenger’s application to “stay” or halt the enforcement of the ETS while the lower courts rule on the merits. While this order is not a final ruling on the matter, the Supreme Court’s decision made clear that the challengers of OSHA’s ETS are “likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Secretary [of Labor] lacked authority to impose the mandate.” 

The CMS Health Care Ruling

In a closer decision, the Supreme Court held the CMS had the authority to mandate vaccination for workers of employers that are Medicare and Medicaid providers. The court acknowledged CMS’s vaccination mandate went further than any rule in the past “[b]ut [that the Secretary of Health and Human Services] has never had to address an infection problem of this scale and scope before.” The court also focused on how common vaccination requirements are within the health care industry generally.

What Do These Rulings Mean for Employers?

While the Supreme Court’s ruling on OSHA’s ETS does not end the vaccine debate or make a final determination, it provides certain employers much desired clarity of the federal government’s requirements. The ruling tells employers with 100 or more employees what they are not required to do from a federal standpoint. However, it does not prohibit employers from instituting vaccination or testing requirements, subject to any applicable state laws and religious or disability-related exemptions.

Employers that provide or supply Medicare or Medicaid services will need to proceed with a vaccination program for their employees. This includes developing and implementing policies and procedures to ensure all employees have at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine or a pending exemption request or grant by January 27.  By February 28, all staff at covered facilities must be identified as either fully vaccinated or exempted or identified as having a temporary delay. The CMS’s guidance on its rule can be found here and here.

For the time being, the Supreme Court’s CMS ruling does not apply to the Northern District of Texas’ separate injunction on the CMS rule, which that court entered after appeal of the broader challenge the Supreme Court ruled on last week. However, given the Supreme Court’s decision, Medicare and Medicaid service providers would be wise to prepare for the Fifth Circuit to rule consistently with the Supreme Court’s decision and mandate a vaccination program for their employees.

Primary Sidebar

Related Attorneys

  • Alana K. Ackels

    Alana K. Ackels

    Partner

    aackels@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1412
  • Katie Beaird

    Katie Beaird

    Partner

    kbeaird@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1478
  • Thomas L. Case

    Thomas L. Case

    Of Counsel

    tcase@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1422
  • Sydnie A. Shimkus

    Sydnie A. Shimkus

    Partner

    sshimkus@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1490
  • Mark A. Shoffner

    Mark A. Shoffner

    Partner

    mshoffner@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1483
  • John D. Smart

    John D. Smart

    Partner

    jsmart@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1475
  • Jay M. Wallace

    Jay M. Wallace

    Partner

    jwallace@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1407

Related Practices

  • Labor and Employment
Stay in the know...
Don’t miss anything — Subscribe to our email list!
2323 Ross Avenue, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 | 214.740.1400
© 2025 Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP All Rights Reserved
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Client Pay
legalink logo Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • People
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • News/Events
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Clients
  • Careers
  • Client Pay