• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP

News/Events

Alerts | June 14, 2022

Texas Supreme Court Rules Contractual Silence is Golden for a Terminated Commission Salesman

The Texas Supreme Court ruled on May 20, 2022 that an employment contract containing no exceptions to an employer’s obligation to pay commissions allowed a terminated at will employee to collect more than $1.5M in commissions on sales made following the termination of his employment. This is a wake-up call for any employer paying employees commissions.

Here Are The Facts. Baylor Miraca Genetics Laboratories, LLC (BMGL) hired Thomas Perthuis (Perthuis) as the VP of Sales and Marketing at an annual base salary, plus a commission of “3.5% of your net sales.” The employment agreement specified that Perthuis was an at-will employee but did not define net sales or place any parameters on the employer’s obligation to pay commissions.                                                

VP of Sales Fired Shortly After Big Sale, What About Commissions? In January 2017, Perthuis successfully negotiated a lucrative contractual amendment with a customer. Perthuis advised BMGL of his success on a Thursday. BMGL fired Perthuis the following Monday, executed the contractual amendment on Tuesday and refused to pay Perthuis commissions on any sales finalized after his termination. In the ensuing litigation, Perthuis asserted that he was the procuring cause of sales made by BMGL to customers he brought to it and was entitled to commissions on those sales after his termination. The Harris County trial court accepted Perthuis’ theory of recovery and awarded him the damages found by the jury. The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court, holding that since no future sales had occurred at the time he was terminated Perthuis had not earned a commission on them.

When are Commissions Owed Post-Termination? The Texas Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals, holding that Perthuis’ employment agreement was unambiguous and lacked any language addressing exceptions to the employer’s duty to pay commissions to him. Consequently, the court held that the procuring cause doctrine, traditionally used in real estate brokerage transactions, is the default rule for a contract that does not place any conditions on an employer’s duty to pay commissions. Under that doctrine a broker is entitled to a commission when a “purchaser is produced through the broker’s efforts, ready, willing and able to buy the property upon the contracted terms.”  The Texas Supreme Court held that employers are free to place any conditions they wish on their duty to pay commissions to employees but that the legal consequence of silence is that the default rule applies, allowing a terminated employee to collect commissions on sales made after the termination of employment.

Employers Beware, Commissions Can be Owed Post Employment. Most employers believe that they have no obligation to pay commissions on sales finalized after the employment relationship ends. Some employers place that condition in a written contract. Others have oral contracts to that effect or rely upon the custom of their business or their industry to not pay commissions on post termination sales. This decision makes it imperative for employers to spell out all terms of commission agreements in writing. Otherwise a commission agreement may turn into the equivalent of a post-employment annuity for the employee. 

If you have any questions or would like to discuss further, please contact our Labor, Employment and Benefits team.

Primary Sidebar

Related Attorneys

  • Alana K. Ackels

    Alana K. Ackels

    Partner

    aackels@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1412
  • Katie Beaird

    Katie Beaird

    Partner

    kbeaird@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1478
  • Thomas L. Case

    Thomas L. Case

    Of Counsel

    tcase@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1422
  • Brent D. Hockaday

    Brent D. Hockaday

    Partner

    bhockaday@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1446
  • Sydnie A. Shimkus

    Sydnie A. Shimkus

    Senior Associate

    sshimkus@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1490
  • Mark A. Shoffner

    Mark A. Shoffner

    Partner

    mshoffner@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1483
  • John D. Smart

    John D. Smart

    Partner

    jsmart@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1475
  • Jay M. Wallace

    Jay M. Wallace

    Partner

    jwallace@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1407
  • Tammy S. Wood

    Tammy S. Wood

    Partner

    twood@bellnunnally.com
    214-740-1465

Related Practices

  • Labor and Employment
Stay in the know...
Don’t miss anything — Subscribe to our email list!
2323 Ross Avenue, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 | 214.740.1400
© 2023 Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP All Rights Reserved
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Client Pay
legalink logo Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • People
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • News/Events
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Clients
  • Careers